Reviews Leaderboard Database Reference Search StorageReview Check Storage Prices Discussion FAQs Reliability Survey Search About StorageReview.com Contents

Quantum Fireball Plus LM


StorageReview.com PayPal Donations



Quantum Fireball Plus LM QM330000LM-A
  April 13, 2000 Author: Eugene Ra  

WB99/Win2k Low-Level Measurements

 Testbed II Low-Level MeasurementsDetails... 
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 11.5|
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (60.0 GB ATA-100) - 12.3|
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (20.4 GB ATA-66) - 12.5|
Fujitsu MPF3xxxAH (10.2 GB ATA-66) - 13.2|
Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm (20.5 GB ATA-66) - 13.8|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 (41.0GB ATA-66) - 14.0|
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (60.0 GB ATA-100) - 39033|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 (41.0GB ATA-66) - 30167|
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (20.4 GB ATA-66) - 29650|
Fujitsu MPF3xxxAH (10.2 GB ATA-66) - 29100|
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 26800|
Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm (20.5 GB ATA-66) - 25067|
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (60.0 GB ATA-100) - 21300|
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 20300|
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (20.4 GB ATA-66) - 19900|
Fujitsu MPF3xxxAH (10.2 GB ATA-66) - 18500|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 (41.0GB ATA-66) - 18500|
Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm (20.5 GB ATA-66) - 16800|

Click here to examine the STR graph for this drive

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Stacked up against the Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40, its obvious competition, the Fireball Plus LM reveals an interesting contrast. In its outermost zones, the LM can't quite keep up with the Plus 40, delivering a top sequential transfer rate of 26.8 MB/sec, over 3 MB/sec lower than the Maxtor drive. However, the drive's STR deteriorates less over the platter. By the time the innermost zone comes in to play, it's the LM that leads the Plus 40, 20.3 MB/sec vs. 18.5 MB/sec.

It's in the area of access time, however, that the Plus LM shines. Despite its specified 8.5 millisecond seek time, the LM turns in a WinBench 99 Disk Access Time of just 11.5ms. To put this in proper perspective, subtract the 4.17ms of latency that a 7200rpm spindle speed delivers plus a bit of overhead: The LM's average seeks take around 7ms. This means that despite its higher spec, Quantum's drive turns in the lowest access time around, beating out even the 8.2ms spec'ed 'Cuda ATA II... and Maxtor's drive, whose access time clocks in at a relatively lofty 14 milliseconds.

 WinMarks...


HOME | ARTICLES | LEADERBOARD | PERFORMANCE DATABASE | REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY | RELIABILITY SURVEY | SUPPORT SR! | ABOUT SR |

Copyright © 1998-2005 StorageReview.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster