Reviews Leaderboard Database Reference Search StorageReview Check Storage Prices Discussion FAQs Reliability Survey Search About StorageReview.com Contents

Quantum Fireball Plus LM


StorageReview.com PayPal Donations



Quantum Fireball Plus LM QM330000LM-A
  April 13, 2000 Author: Eugene Ra  

IOMeter Performance

 Testbed II IOMeter - Workstation Access Pattern - Total I/Os per secondDetails... 
Windows 2000 Professional, Unpartitioned
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 95.70
|
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (60.0 GB ATA-100)
- 88.80
|
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 86.74
|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 (41.0GB ATA-66)
- 85.06
|
Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm (20.5 GB ATA-66)
- 81.12
|
Fujitsu MPF3xxxAH (10.2 GB ATA-66)
- 80.56
|
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 102.13
|
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (60.0 GB ATA-100)
- 96.15
|
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 91.01
|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 (41.0GB ATA-66)
- 88.91
|
Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm (20.5 GB ATA-66)
- 85.02
|
Fujitsu MPF3xxxAH (10.2 GB ATA-66)
- 83.17
|
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 124.51
|
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (60.0 GB ATA-100)
- 122.55
|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 (41.0GB ATA-66)
- 108.19
|
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 106.50
|
Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm (20.5 GB ATA-66)
- 102.06
|
Fujitsu MPF3xxxAH (10.2 GB ATA-66)
- 95.17
|
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 143.25
|
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (60.0 GB ATA-100)
- 143.06
|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 (41.0GB ATA-66)
- 124.62
|
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 118.95
|
Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm (20.5 GB ATA-66)
- 114.30
|
Fujitsu MPF3xxxAH (10.2 GB ATA-66)
- 104.68
|
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 163.33
|
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (60.0 GB ATA-100)
- 160.21
|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 (41.0GB ATA-66)
- 136.03
|
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 131.87
|
Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm (20.5 GB ATA-66)
- 122.97
|
Fujitsu MPF3xxxAH (10.2 GB ATA-66)
- 111.80
|

It's in Intel's benchmark that the Fireball Plus LM shines. A fast access time combined with what must be stellar firmware power the LM to the top of the charts, allowing it to uniformly best the DiamondMax Plus 40 across the board.

In a simple linear test under a Workstation Access Pattern, the LM surpasses the Plus 40 by 12%. The difference rises to 15% in Very Light, Light, and Moderate Loads. Finally, in a Heavy Load situation, the LM tops the Plus 40 by a rather beefy 20%.

As evidenced by the above graphs, the Quantum unit's showing is quite impressive. We're witnessing a drive that's easily in a class of its own.

 Legacy Tests...


HOME | ARTICLES | LEADERBOARD | PERFORMANCE DATABASE | REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY | RELIABILITY SURVEY | SUPPORT SR! | ABOUT SR |

Copyright © 1998-2005 StorageReview.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster