Reviews Leaderboard Database Reference Search StorageReview Check Storage Prices Discussion FAQs Reliability Survey Search About StorageReview.com Contents

Quantum Fireball Plus LM


StorageReview.com PayPal Donations



Quantum Fireball Plus LM QM330000LM-A
  April 13, 2000 Author: Eugene Ra  

Legacy Tests

 Testbed I Legacy TestsDetails... 
Windows 95, OSR 2.1 using FAT32
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 4170|
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 3763|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 3650|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 3387|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 3343|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - Not Tested
Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 4710|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 4267|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 4247|
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 4100|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 4047|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - Not Tested
Windows 95, OSR 2.1 using FAT32
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 14067|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 12133|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 11733|
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 11700|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 10300|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - Not Tested
Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 15500|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 12933|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 12700|
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 11800|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 11533|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - Not Tested
ThreadMark 2.0 Data Transfer Rate
Windows 95, OSR 2.1 using FAT32
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 12.55|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 9.17|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 8.81|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 8.49|
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 7.63|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - Not Tested
Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 15.12|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 13.95|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 11.29|
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 10.31|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 10.14|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - Not Tested
Business Disk WinMark 98
Windows 95, OSR 2.1 using FAT32
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 2560|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 2478|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 2102|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 1978|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - 1240|
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - Not Tested
Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 2876|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 2778|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 2622|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 2444|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - Not Tested
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - Not Tested
High-End Disk WinMark 98
Windows 95, OSR 2.1 using FAT32
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 6214|
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 6180|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 5682|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 5470|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - 3504|
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - Not Tested
Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS
Western Digital Expert (18.0 GB ATA-66) - 6742|
IBM Deskstar 22GXP (22.0 GB ATA-66) - 6712|
Quantum Fireball Plus KA (18.2 GB ATA-66) - 6460|
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 5120 (20.4 GB ATA-33) - 6450|
Quantum Atlas II (4.5 GB UW-SCSI) - Not Tested
Quantum Fireball Plus LM (30.0 GB ATA-66) - Not Tested

For those readers still interested, the above graphs outline the Fireball Plus LM's performance in our original testbed. The Business and High-End Disk WinMark scores for the Quantum fall right in line with those turned in by Maxtor's unit, the disparity in both cases less than 2%.

In NT 4.0, the Plus 40 pulls away, with the LM clocking in with #'s about 10% less. It's interesting to note that while the Business Disk WinMark result is relatively the same between NT with the Old Testbed and Win2k with the New System, the margins are rather different in the High-End. Win2k with a 700 MHz processor turns out similar High-End scores for both the Maxtor and Quantum. NT4 with a 266 MHz processor, however, does not. Though some may attribute the disparity to differences in the OS, it may also indicate that WinBench99 scores don't always scale proportionately between drive models as processor speed increases.

 Conclusion...


HOME | ARTICLES | LEADERBOARD | PERFORMANCE DATABASE | REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY | RELIABILITY SURVEY | SUPPORT SR! | ABOUT SR |

Copyright © 1998-2005 StorageReview.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster