Reviews Leaderboard Database Reference Search StorageReview Check Storage Prices Discussion FAQs Reliability Survey Search About StorageReview.com Contents

Western Digital Caviar


StorageReview.com PayPal Donations



Western Digital Caviar WD450AA
  May 24, 2000 Author: Eugene Ra  

IOMeter Performance

 Testbed II IOMeter - Workstation Access Pattern - Total I/Os per secondDetails... 
Windows 2000 Professional, Unpartitioned
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 79.98
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 78.89
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 73.91
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 66.43
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 64.87
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 60.91
|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 82.57
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 81.39
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 77.36
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 69.67
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 66.03
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 65.57
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 94.77
|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 94.76
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 93.21
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 88.03
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 83.84
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 76.29
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 106.04
|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 103.73
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 101.42
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 100.67
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 97.06
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 92.28
|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 114.08
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 113.36
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 112.38
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 109.64
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 107.13
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 101.15
|

The lower access time of Maxtor's DiamondMax 60 gives it a considerable advantage over the WD450AA in Linear and Very Light loads when it comes to Workstation performance. Under such conditions, we find the WD drive trailing the Maxtor by about 7%.

Under any heavier load, however, firmware optimizations start to muddy the picture. Light, Medium and Heavy scenarios all suggest virtually equal performance, with the WD actually pulling ahead by a negligible amount under Medium loads. Thus, for most purposes, IOMeter concurs with WinBench 99, placing the two drives on practically equal grounds.

We should take a moment to note that neither the WD or the Maxtor can deliver the performance scored by Quantum's "value-class" Fireball lct10. Of course, a converse scenario is also true... the Fireball doesn't score nearly as well as the WD and Maxtor in WinBench. It should, of course, be clear to readers that we heavily favor IOMeter due to WinBench 99's advancing age and increasingly inconsistent hypotheses.

 Conclusion...


HOME | ARTICLES | LEADERBOARD | PERFORMANCE DATABASE | REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY | RELIABILITY SURVEY | SUPPORT SR! | ABOUT SR |

Copyright © 1998-2005 StorageReview.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster