Reviews Leaderboard Database Reference Search StorageReview Check Storage Prices Discussion FAQs Reliability Survey Search About StorageReview.com Contents

Seagate Cheetah X15


StorageReview.com PayPal Donations



Seagate Cheetah X15 ST318451LW
  June 1, 2000 Author: Eugene Ra  

WB99/Win2k Low-Level Measurements

 Testbed II Low-Level MeasurementsDetails... 
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Seagate Cheetah X15 (18.4 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 6.8|
Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 7.9|
Fujitsu MAJ3xxx (18.2 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 8.5|
IBM Ultrastar 36LZX (18.3 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 8.5|
Seagate Cheetah 18XL (18.4 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 8.9|
Seagate Cheetah 18LP AV (18.2 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 9.1|
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Fujitsu MAJ3xxx (18.2 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 42767|
Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 41467|
Seagate Cheetah X15 (18.4 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 41067|
Seagate Cheetah 18XL (18.4 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 35967|
IBM Ultrastar 36LZX (18.3 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 34800|
Seagate Cheetah 18LP AV (18.2 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 28100|
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Seagate Cheetah X15 (18.4 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 28733|
Fujitsu MAJ3xxx (18.2 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 28300|
Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 25000|
Seagate Cheetah 18XL (18.4 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 25000|
IBM Ultrastar 36LZX (18.3 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 22800|
Seagate Cheetah 18LP AV (18.2 GB Ultra160/m SCSI) - 17500|

Click here to examine the STR graph for this drive

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

The Cheetah X15 turns in an average access time of 6.8 milliseconds... considering the drive's specified 3.9 millisecond seek time and its 2 millisecond rotational latency, this is actually a tad on the high side, even considering various overheads. Take a look, for example, at the Quantum Atlas 10k II, the previous access time champion. It meets its expected access time dead on, at 7.8 milliseconds. Yes, the X15 has the lowest measured time to date, but not nearly by the margin we expected.

Despite its smaller sector-per-track count in its outermost zone, the X15 turns in record sequential transfer rates. WinBench 99 measures the drive at 41 MB/sec, just a smidgeon ahead of the Atlas 10K II's 40 MB/sec score. The drive's inner zone transfer rate, relatively speaking, is even more impressive, weighing in at nearly 29 MB/sec, almost a full 4 MB/sec faster than the Atlas 10k II or the Cheetah 18XL, for that matter.

 WinMarks...


HOME | ARTICLES | LEADERBOARD | PERFORMANCE DATABASE | REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY | RELIABILITY SURVEY | SUPPORT SR! | ABOUT SR |

Copyright © 1998-2005 StorageReview.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster