Reviews Leaderboard Database Reference Search StorageReview Check Storage Prices Discussion FAQs Reliability Survey Search About StorageReview.com Contents

Seagate U10


StorageReview.com PayPal Donations



Seagate U10 ST320423A
  June 15, 2000 Author: Eugene Ra  

WB99/Win2k WinMarks

 Testbed II WB99/Win2k WinMarksDetails... 
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66) - 6763|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66) - 6703|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100) - 6587|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100) - 5947|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66) - 4510|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 4187|
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66) - 16067|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66) - 16000|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100) - 15433|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100) - 15200|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66) - 10100|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 9777|

The U10's slower accesses come to haunt it in the high-level WinBench 99 WinMarks. Despite its higher sequential transfer rates, the Seagate drive lags behind Quantum's offering by a margin of 8% in the Business Disk WinMark 99. The margin increases in the High-End WinMark, where the U10 trails the lct10 by a margin of 12%.

We should take a moment to note that the lct10, while our current 5400rpm Leaderboard choice, isn't itself a standout it ZD's benchmark. Drives such as Maxtor's DiamondMax VL20 and Western Digital's Caviar WD307AA outperform the Quantum by margins of 20% or more.

As we've indicated before, the real test lies with Intel's IOMeter. Let's take a look at how the U10 fares there.

 IOMeter Performance...


HOME | ARTICLES | LEADERBOARD | PERFORMANCE DATABASE | REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY | RELIABILITY SURVEY | SUPPORT SR! | ABOUT SR |

Copyright © 1998-2005 StorageReview.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster