Reviews Leaderboard Database Reference Search StorageReview Check Storage Prices Discussion FAQs Reliability Survey Search About StorageReview.com Contents

Seagate U10


StorageReview.com PayPal Donations



Seagate U10 ST320423A
  June 15, 2000 Author: Eugene Ra  

IOMeter Performance

 Testbed II IOMeter - Workstation Access Pattern - Total I/Os per secondDetails... 
Windows 2000 Professional, Unpartitioned
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 79.98
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 78.89
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 73.91
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 66.43
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 64.87
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 60.91
|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 82.57
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 81.39
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 77.36
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 69.67
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 66.03
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 65.57
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 94.77
|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 94.76
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 93.21
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 88.03
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 83.84
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 76.29
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 106.04
|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 103.73
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 101.42
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 100.67
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 97.06
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 92.28
|
Maxtor DiamondMax 60 (60.1 GB ATA-66)
- 114.08
|
Western Digital Caviar WD450AA (45.0 GB ATA-66)
- 113.36
|
Western Digital Protege WD200EB (20.0 GB ATA-100)
- 112.38
|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100)
- 109.64
|
Quantum Fireball lct15 (30.0 GB ATA-66)
- 107.13
|
Seagate U10 (20.4 GB ATA-66)
- 101.15
|

The Quantum Fireball lct10's relatively swift access time keeps the Seagate U10 at bay in IOMeter. Under a Linear Workstation load, Seagate's drive lags behind Quantum's by 15%. The gap only widens under heavier loads, peaking at over 24% under a Light load.

 Conclusion...


HOME | ARTICLES | LEADERBOARD | PERFORMANCE DATABASE | REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY | RELIABILITY SURVEY | SUPPORT SR! | ABOUT SR |

Copyright © 1998-2005 StorageReview.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster