Hard Drive Physicals
Device Name & Review Link Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Model Designation QM336400TY-LW
Rotations Per Minute 10000 RPM
Gigabytes Per Platter 7.3 GB
Seek Time 4.7 ms
Buffer Size 8192 KB
Warranty 5 years
Rated Idle Noise 38 dB
Power Consumption 10 watts

Page not found | StorageReview.com

Page not found

The requested page could not be found.


 Testbed II  Ziff Davis WinBench 99 under Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS *  Testbed II 
Benchmark Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Business Disk WinMark 99 (KB/sec) 8247
High-End Disk WinMark 99 (KB/sec) 24633
AVS/Express 3.4 (KB/sec) 29567
FrontPage 98 (KB/sec) 99767
MicroStation SE (KB/sec) 27867
Photoshop 4.0 (KB/sec) 13667
Premiere 4.2 (KB/sec) 19600
Sound Forge 4.0 (KB/sec) 27133
Visual C++ (KB/sec) 22933
Disk/Read Transfer Rate StorageReview.com
Beginning (KB/sec) 40167
End (KB/sec) 25000
Disk Access Time (ms) 7.8
Disk CPU Utilization (%) 0.34

Legacy WinBench Benchmarks

 Testbed I  Ziff Davis WinBench 99 under Windows 95 OSR 2.1 using FAT 32 *  Testbed I 
Benchmark Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Business Disk WinMark 99 (KB/sec) 5153
High-End Disk WinMark 99 (KB/sec) 18600
AVS/Express 3.4 (KB/sec) 17100
FrontPage 98 (KB/sec) 40033
MicroStation SE (KB/sec) 18133
Photoshop 4.0 (KB/sec) 14967
Premiere 4.2 (KB/sec) 11933
Sound Forge 4.0 (KB/sec) 28800
Visual C++ (KB/sec) 19400
Disk/Read Transfer Rate StorageReview.com
Beginning (KB/sec) 41133
End (KB/sec) 24900
Disk Access Time (ms) 8.0
Disk CPU Utilization (%) 5.64

 Testbed I  Ziff Davis WinBench 99 under Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS *  Testbed I 
Benchmark Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Business Disk WinMark 99 (KB/sec) 5423
High-End Disk WinMark 99 (KB/sec) 20000
AVS/Express 3.4 (KB/sec) 32233
FrontPage 98 (KB/sec) 38133
MicroStation SE (KB/sec) 21500
Photoshop 4.0 (KB/sec) 11267
Premiere 4.2 (KB/sec) 17100
Sound Forge 4.0 (KB/sec) 24833
Visual C++ (KB/sec) 16733
Disk/Read Transfer Rate StorageReview.com
Beginning (KB/sec) 41367
End (KB/sec) 24967
Disk Access Time (ms) 7.8
Disk CPU Utilization (%) 2.73

 Testbed I  ThreadMark 2.0 under Windows 95 OSR 2.1 using FAT 32 *  Testbed I 
Benchmark Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Data Transfer Rate (MB/sec) 24.40
Average CPU Utilization (%) 63.91
KB/sec per 1% CPU Utilization (KB/sec) 382

 Testbed I  ThreadMark 2.0 under Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS *  Testbed I 
Benchmark Quantum Atlas 10k II (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Data Transfer Rate (MB/sec) 30.52
Average CPU Utilization (%) 49.68
KB/sec per 1% CPU Utilization (KB/sec) 614

IOMeter Benchmarks

 Testbed II  Intel IOMeter  Testbed II 
1 worker, 10 minutes, 30 second rampup
All Loads Linear Very Light Light Moderate Heavy
File Server Access Pattern StorageReview.com
Total I/Os per second 119.99 144.95 144.37 219.44 267.90
Total MBs per second 1.31 1.58 1.58 2.39 2.92
Average I/O Response Time (ms) 8.33 27.59 110.82 291.60 955.07
CPU Utilization (%) 0.46 0.49 0.53 0.82 1.07
I/Os per % CPU Utilization 260.85 295.82 272.40 267.61 250.37
Workstation Access Pattern StorageReview.com
Total I/Os per second 129.39 145.06 145.16 211.60 252.59
Total MBs per second 1.01 1.13 1.13 1.65 1.97
Average I/O Response Time (ms) 7.73 27.57 110.22 302.41 1012.76
CPU Utilization (%) 0.43 0.52 0.53 0.82 1.02
I/Os per % CPU Utilization 300.91 278.96 273.89 258.05 247.64
Database Access Pattern StorageReview.com
Total I/Os per second 120.87 146.96 146.89 222.30 273.85
Total MBs per second 0.94 1.15 1.15 1.74 2.14
Average I/O Response Time (ms) 8.27 27.22 108.91 287.85 934.21
CPU Utilization (%) 0.42 0.55 0.61 0.86 1.30
I/Os per % CPU Utilization 287.79 267.20 240.80 258.49 210.65

* Testing Parameters At A Glance
1 worker, 10 minutes, 30 second rampup.
File Server Access Pattern File Server Access Pattern
Workstation Access Pattern 8k blocks, 80% Random, 80% Read
Database Access Pattern 8k blocks, 100% Random, 67% Read
Linear 1 I/O
Very Light 4 I/Os
Light 16 I/Os
Moderate 64 I/Os
Heavy 256 I/Os

*Note: Threadmark 2.0 and WinBench98 test results are the average of five trials.
WinBench99 test results are the average of three trials.
Windows 2000 Professional Test Bed Disclosure
Windows 95 Test Bed Disclosure
Windows NT 4.0 Test Bed Disclosure
Visit the StorageReview.com Database

Return to the top of this page

Copyright © 1998-2000 Hardware Research, LLC. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster