View The Benchmark Scores of the Seagate Cheetah 36LP 1st Sample
Hard Drive Physicals
Device Name & Review Link
Seagate Cheetah 36LP (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Model Designation
ST336704LW
Rotations Per Minute
10000 RPM
Gigabytes Per Platter
6.1 GB
Seek Time
5.2 ms
Buffer Size
4096 KB
Warranty
5 years
Rated Idle Noise
39 dB
Power Consumption
11 watts
Page not found | StorageReview.com
Page not found
The requested page could not be found.
Testbed II
Ziff Davis WinBench 99 under Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
*
Testbed II
Benchmark
Seagate Cheetah 36LP (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Business Disk WinMark 99
(KB/sec)
6170
High-End Disk WinMark 99
(KB/sec)
17167
AVS/Express 3.4
(KB/sec)
19733
FrontPage 98
(KB/sec)
80900
MicroStation SE
(KB/sec)
28367
Photoshop 4.0
(KB/sec)
11567
Premiere 4.2
(KB/sec)
10867
Sound Forge 4.0
(KB/sec)
14633
Visual C++
(KB/sec)
15933
Disk/Read Transfer Rate
StorageReview.com
Beginning
(KB/sec)
36133
End
(KB/sec)
24100
Disk Access Time
(ms)
9.0
Disk CPU Utilization
(%)
0.19
Legacy WinBench Benchmarks
Testbed I
Ziff Davis WinBench 99 under Windows 95 OSR 2.1 using FAT 32
*
Testbed I
Benchmark
Seagate Cheetah 36LP (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Business Disk WinMark 99
(KB/sec)
4120
High-End Disk WinMark 99
(KB/sec)
15533
AVS/Express 3.4
(KB/sec)
11400
FrontPage 98
(KB/sec)
38367
MicroStation SE
(KB/sec)
15333
Photoshop 4.0
(KB/sec)
12867
Premiere 4.2
(KB/sec)
11933
Sound Forge 4.0
(KB/sec)
20933
Visual C++
(KB/sec)
16033
Disk/Read Transfer Rate
StorageReview.com
Beginning
(KB/sec)
36000
End
(KB/sec)
24100
Disk Access Time
(ms)
9.4
Disk CPU Utilization
(%)
5.63
Testbed I
Ziff Davis WinBench 99 under Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS
*
Testbed I
Benchmark
Seagate Cheetah 36LP (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Business Disk WinMark 99
(KB/sec)
4570
High-End Disk WinMark 99
(KB/sec)
15700
AVS/Express 3.4
(KB/sec)
20800
FrontPage 98
(KB/sec)
36267
MicroStation SE
(KB/sec)
21167
Photoshop 4.0
(KB/sec)
9067
Premiere 4.2
(KB/sec)
12800
Sound Forge 4.0
(KB/sec)
15367
Visual C++
(KB/sec)
14433
Disk/Read Transfer Rate
StorageReview.com
Beginning
(KB/sec)
36100
End
(KB/sec)
24100
Disk Access Time
(ms)
9.1
Disk CPU Utilization
(%)
2.57
Testbed I
ThreadMark 2.0 under Windows 95 OSR 2.1 using FAT 32
*
Testbed I
Benchmark
Seagate Cheetah 36LP (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Data Transfer Rate
(MB/sec)
15.04
Average CPU Utilization
(%)
43.36
KB/sec per 1% CPU Utilization
(KB/sec)
347
Testbed I
ThreadMark 2.0 under Windows NT 4.0 using NTFS
*
Testbed I
Benchmark
Seagate Cheetah 36LP (36.7 GB Ultra160/m SCSI)
Data Transfer Rate
(MB/sec)
20.20
Average CPU Utilization
(%)
33.00
KB/sec per 1% CPU Utilization
(KB/sec)
612
IOMeter Benchmarks
Testbed II
Intel IOMeter
Testbed II
1 worker, 10 minutes, 30 second rampup
All Loads
Linear
Very Light
Light
Moderate
Heavy
File Server Access Pattern
StorageReview.com
Total I/Os per second
100.59
141.41
141.19
199.45
247.44
Total MBs per second
1.09
1.53
1.54
2.15
2.69
Average I/O Response Time (ms)
9.94
28.28
113.31
320.81
1033.89
CPU Utilization (%)
0.34
0.56
0.54
0.76
1.03
I/Os per % CPU Utilization
295.85
252.52
261.46
262.43
240.23
Workstation Access Pattern
StorageReview.com
Total I/Os per second
120.98
152.57
152.26
204.66
245.35
Total MBs per second
0.95
1.19
1.19
1.60
1.92
Average I/O Response Time (ms)
8.26
26.21
105.08
312.62
1042.73
CPU Utilization (%)
0.43
0.57
0.52
0.79
1.08
I/Os per % CPU Utilization
281.35
267.67
292.81
259.06
227.18
Database Access Pattern
StorageReview.com
Total I/Os per second
101.75
148.33
148.33
205.75
257.14
Total MBs per second
0.79
1.16
1.16
1.61
2.01
Average I/O Response Time (ms)
9.83
26.96
107.86
311.03
995.04
CPU Utilization (%)
0.34
0.59
0.62
0.73
1.05
I/Os per % CPU Utilization
299.26
251.41
239.24
281.85
244.90
*
Testing Parameters At A Glance
1 worker, 10 minutes, 30 second rampup.
File Server Access Pattern
File Server Access Pattern
Workstation Access Pattern
8k blocks, 80% Random, 80% Read
Database Access Pattern
8k blocks, 100% Random, 67% Read
Linear
1 I/O
Very Light
4 I/Os
Light
16 I/Os
Moderate
64 I/Os
Heavy
256 I/Os
*Note:
Threadmark 2.0 and WinBench98 test results are the average of five trials.
WinBench99 test results are the average of three trials.
Windows 2000 Professional Test Bed Disclosure
Windows 95 Test Bed Disclosure
Windows NT 4.0 Test Bed Disclosure
Visit the StorageReview.com Database
Copyright © 1998-2000 Hardware Research, LLC. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster