Reviews Leaderboard Database Reference Search StorageReview Check Storage Prices Discussion FAQs Reliability Survey Search About StorageReview.com Contents

Maxtor DiamondMax 80


StorageReview.com PayPal Donations



Maxtor DiamondMax 80 98196H8
  September 5, 2000 Author: Eugene Ra  


WB99/Win2k Low-Level Measurements

 Testbed II Low-Level MeasurementsDetails... 
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Quantum Fireball lct10 (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 14.2|
IBM Deskstar 40GV (40.0 GB ATA-66) - 14.7|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100) - 15.4|
Maxtor DiamondMax 80 (82.0 GB ATA-100) - 15.5|
Maxtor DiamondMax VL40 (40.9 GB ATA-100) - 15.8|
Seagate U5 (40.8 GB ATA-100) - 19.4|
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Seagate U5 (40.8 GB ATA-100) - 31600|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100) - 30467|
IBM Deskstar 40GV (40.0 GB ATA-66) - 30367|
Maxtor DiamondMax 80 (82.0 GB ATA-100) - 29800|
Maxtor DiamondMax VL40 (40.9 GB ATA-100) - 29800|
Quantum Fireball lct10 (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 22500|
Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS
Seagate U5 (40.8 GB ATA-100) - 20700|
Fujitsu MPG3xxxAT (41.0 GB ATA-100) - 18700|
Maxtor DiamondMax 80 (82.0 GB ATA-100) - 17500|
Maxtor DiamondMax VL40 (40.9 GB ATA-100) - 17500|
IBM Deskstar 40GV (40.0 GB ATA-66) - 14933|
Quantum Fireball lct10 (30.0 GB ATA-66) - 14000|

Click here to examine the STR graph for this drive

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Low level tests using ZD's WinBench 99 show that, in outer zones, the DiamondMax 80 clocks in with a sequential transfer rate of just under 30 MB/sec... about 10% slower than the IBM Deskstar 40GV. The DM80, however, maintains its transfer rate more proficiently as we advance inwards through the cylinders. Inner-track rates come in at 17.5 MB/sec, 17% faster than IBM's unit.

WB99 measures the DM80's access time at 15.5 milliseconds... subtracting a 5400 RPM rotational latency of about 5.5 milliseconds, this figure comes in a millisecond higher than Maxtor's specification of 9 ms seek time. Interestingly, this figure is also a millisecond higher than that of its predecessor, the DiamondMax 60. Maxtor indicates that it scaled back its next-generation 7200 RPM unit, the forthcoming DiamondMax Plus 45, due to concerns of combining high areal densities with swift seek times. The three-platter version of the DM80 may turn in slightly faster seeks.

 WinMarks...


HOME | ARTICLES | LEADERBOARD | PERFORMANCE DATABASE | REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY | RELIABILITY SURVEY | SUPPORT SR! | ABOUT SR |

Copyright © 1998-2005 StorageReview.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Write: Webmaster