Western Digital Raptor WD740GD-00FLC0
|
|
Recently, we requested four of WD's latest-revision Raptors to provide a reference comparison against which other enterprise-oriented SATA disks may be compared in Testbed4's expanded multi-drive array coverage. The first order of business was to put a single drive to the test operating off of the machine's standard SI3124-2 controller. As the results poured in, it became clear that significant performance differences exist between these drives, the "00FLC0" revision, and our former samples, the "00FLA1"s.
Four major versions of the product have made it into the channel: the original 00FLA0 (covered in SR's initial review), the 00FLA1 (featured in our look at Raptor RAID performance and subsequently reassessed under Testbed4), the 00FLA2 (not tested by SR), and 00FLC0, the revision featured in this writeup.
Readers have filled the SR forums agonizing over the purchase of the venerable Raptor versus one of the new 400+ GB SATA disks that combine performance with monstrous capacity. To assist in solving this dilemma (or to add fuel to the fire), we have decided to take one last look at a drive destined to be a classic.
The following performance tests contrast the Raptor with these drives:
| Hitachi Deskstar 7K500 (500 GB) | Currently the fastest 7200 RPM Drive |
| Fujitsu MAT3300 (300 GB) | High-performance 10,000 RPM SCSI Drive |
| Maxtor Atlas 10K V (300 GB) | High-performance 10,000 RPM SCSI Drive |
| Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD4000KD (400 GB) | WD's largest drive |