 |
|
4.5 GB Ultra SCSI Drive Review
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
SCSI drives have always come to mind to those looking for the ultimate
in performance and expandability. The fastest hard drives available
today are 10,000rpm platter drives, available only with SCSI interfaces.
In addition, Wide SCSI controllers can handle up to 15 devices per
channel with multiple devices using the bus simultaneously. ATA,
on the other hand, has a limit of two devices per channel, one of
which may be in use at any given time. SCSI is a much more intelligent
interface, with queuing features that enhance performance in multithreading
and multitasking operations. SCSI drives are much more expensive,
however, let alone the cost of a SCSI host interface, which is not
typically found on motherboards.
Debates rage on in newsgroups how much advantage SCSI hard drives
have over their ATA counterparts and whether or not they are worth
the extra money for the "average" user. There is no denying
that the average 4.5GB SCSI hard drive seems to cost more than twice
what a 4.5GB ATA drive does. SCSI drives usually have better specs
than ATA drives such as higher rotation speeds, lower seek times,
larger buffers. It often seems that benchmarks, including Ziff Davis'
Winbench 98, do not show a large difference in performance between
SCSI and ATA drives. SCSI drives do, however, lag in areal
density, allowing their slower-spinning ATA counterparts to
keep up in sequential data transfer. For typical single-user use,
WinBench 98 figures accurately portray the perceived difference
in performance between ATA and SCSI drives. Unless it's a Cheetah,
it's simply not going to seem that much faster.
For this test, we used an Abit LX6 motherboard (v1.1, bios v C7Q),
a 266 MHz Intel Pentium II processor, a 64MB 10ns SDRAM DIMM, and
a Matrox Millennium II PCI 4MB (bios v1.2, Powerdesk v3.80). The
SCSI controller was the Adaptec AHA-2940U2W. Read caching and write
caching were enabled on all tested drives. The boot drive (Seagate
Hawk 4XL ST34555) contained Windows 95 OSR 2.1 patched with Intel's
82371xB INF Update. The tests were run at 1024x768 with 24 bit color
at 85 Hz using small fonts. Here is a link to the test
bed information. All drives were formatted with Fat 32 to the
largest possible drive size. ZDBop's Startup Manager was used to
prevent loading of background applications. ZDBop's WinBench 98
v1.0's Disk Test Suites were run on all test drives. These test
results represent the average of five runs.
|
|
· IBM Ultrastar 2XP DCHS-34550
|
 |
|
Ziff Davis WinBench 98 - IBM Ultrastar 2XP DCHS-34550
|
| Business
Disk WinMark 98 |
1426 KB/sec
|
| SS/Database
|
1208 KB/sec
|
| WP |
1788 KB/sec
|
| Publishing
|
1350 KB/sec
|
| Browsers
|
1668 KB/sec
|
| Task Switching
|
1616 KB/sec
|
| |
| High-End
Disk WinMark 98 |
3732 KB/sec
|
| AVS/Express
3.1 |
2606 KB/sec
|
| Frontpage
97 |
3210 KB/sec
|
| Microstation
95 |
7396 KB/sec
|
| Photoshop
4.0 |
2254 KB/sec
|
| Premiere
4.2 |
7662 KB/sec
|
| PV-Wave
6.1 |
2998 KB/sec
|
| Visual C++
5.0 |
7346 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
Random Access |
12.6 ms |
| |
| Disk/Read
Transfer Rate |
|
| Beginning
|
9570 KB/sec
|
| End |
6540 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
CPU Utilization |
6.9%
|
| Transfer
Rate |
9101 KB/sec
|
|
| IBM's Ultrastar 2XP weighs in as the most expensive drive
in this roundup, an astonishing $800 in price. IBM provides
a thorough multi-lingual manual. One would infer top performance
from this drive, especially in the light of IBM's showing in
the UltraATA drive roundup. The 2XP does indeed provide decent
performance, but nevertheless disappointed given the price.
Seagate's Cheetah and Barracuda both bested the Ultrastar 2XP
in performance and both cost significantly less. This drive
cannot be recommended due to its lofty price. |
|
|
|
| |
|
· Quantum Atlas II QM34550AL-SW
|
| |
|
Ziff Davis WinBench 98 - Quantum Atlas II QM34550AL-SW
|
| Business
Disk WinMark 98 |
1240 KB/sec
|
| SS/Database
|
1122 KB/sec
|
| WP |
1442 KB/sec
|
| Publishing
|
1186 KB/sec
|
| Browsers
|
1310 KB/sec
|
| Task Switching
|
1912 KB/sec
|
| |
| High-End
Disk WinMark 98 |
3504 KB/sec
|
| AVS/Express
3.1 |
1966 KB/sec
|
| Frontpage
97 |
3242 KB/sec
|
| Microstation
95 |
6658 KB/sec
|
| Photoshop
4.0 |
3240 KB/sec
|
| Premiere
4.2 |
5912 KB/sec
|
| PV-Wave
6.1 |
2260 KB/sec
|
| Visual C++
5.0 |
9132 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
Random Access |
13.3 ms |
| |
| Disk/Read
Transfer Rate |
|
| Beginning
|
9860 KB/sec
|
| End |
5874 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
CPU Utilization |
5.3%
|
| Transfer
Rate |
9839 KB/sec
|
|
| Quantum's Atlas II was something of a puzzle. Priced at about
$100 more than the Viking, the Atlas II is offered as the high-performance
drive of Quantum's lineup. Even so, the Atlas II posted disappointing
scores, bringing up the rear in the Business Disk Winmark and
scoring second-to-last in the High-End Disk Winmark. It trailed
its own lower priced cousin, the Viking, by 10%. Drive documentation
was minimal, consisting of a leaflet describing how to set the
SCSI ID of the device along with termination procedures. Given
the lower cost and higher performance of both the Viking and
the Seagate Hawk 4XL, The Quantum Atlas II cannot be recommended.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
· Quantum Viking QM34550VK-SW
|
| |
|
Ziff Davis WinBench 98 - Quantum Viking QM34550VK-SW
|
| Business
Disk WinMark 98 |
1372 KB/sec
|
| SS/Database
|
1216 KB/sec
|
| WP |
1680 KB/sec
|
| Publishing
|
1278 KB/sec
|
| Browsers
|
1502 KB/sec
|
| Task Switching
|
1894 KB/sec
|
| |
| High-End
Disk WinMark 98 |
3884 KB/sec
|
| AVS/Express
3.1 |
2410 KB/sec
|
| Frontpage
97 |
3156 KB/sec
|
| Microstation
95 |
7152 KB/sec
|
| Photoshop
4.0 |
3016 KB/sec
|
| Premiere
4.2 |
7316 KB/sec
|
| PV-Wave
6.1 |
2868 KB/sec
|
| Visual C++
5.0 |
8782 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
Random Access |
13.7 ms |
| |
| Disk/Read
Transfer Rate |
|
| Beginning
|
10700 KB/sec
|
| End |
6258 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
CPU Utilization |
5.8%
|
| Transfer
Rate |
10745 KB/sec
|
|
| Positioned between the Atlas and Fireball families, Quantum's
Viking is marketed as the company's middle-of-the-line drive.
In this roundup of drives, the Viking proves to be the bargain
of the group. Priced at a relatively skimpy $381, it resides
at the bottom of the price hierarchy yet provides performance
that approaches Seagate's much more expensive Barracuda XL.
Although Seagate's Hawk 4XL provides virtually the same performance,
Quantum back's the Viking with a 5 year warranty rather than
the Hawk's 3 year protection. The drive operated cool, easily
handled after extended use. The only drawback was a tiny bit
of noise. During operation, the Viking seemed to create a low-pitched
hum. Though noticeable, the noise was nevertheless much easier
to tune out than the Cheetah's whine. Curiously, the drive came
with no documentation whatsoever; SCSI ID and termination settings
had to be retrieved from Quantum's web page. Caveats aside,
a low price combined with good performance and solid warranty
merit the selection of the Viking as Storage Review's low-priced
UltraSCSI drive recommendation. |
|
|
|
| |
|
· Seagate Barracuda 4XL ST34572W
|
| |
|
Ziff Davis WinBench 98 - Seagate Barracuda 4XL ST34572W
|
| Business
Disk WinMark 98 |
1454 KB/sec
|
| SS/Database
|
1270 KB/sec
|
| WP |
1796 KB/sec
|
| Publishing
|
1354 KB/sec
|
| Browsers
|
1638 KB/sec
|
| Task Switching
|
1922 KB/sec
|
| |
| High-End
Disk WinMark 98 |
4184 KB/sec
|
| AVS/Express
3.1 |
2720 KB/sec
|
| Frontpage
97 |
3304 KB/sec
|
| Microstation
95 |
7758 KB/sec
|
| Photoshop
4.0 |
3238 KB/sec
|
| Premiere
4.2 |
7722 KB/sec
|
| PV-Wave
6.1 |
3070 KB/sec
|
| Visual C++
5.0 |
9136 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
Random Access |
14.0 ms |
| |
| Disk/Read
Transfer Rate |
|
| Beginning
|
10700 KB/sec
|
| End |
6720 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
CPU Utilization |
5.8%
|
| Transfer
Rate |
10716 KB/sec
|
|
| The Seagate Barracuda 4XL is a high-performance drive, posting
solid benchmark results second only to its sibling, the Cheetah
4LP. Although it took second place honors in both the Business
and High-End Winmark tests, the Barracuda XL is hard to recommend
given its price. A prospective buyer can save about $200 with
relatively little performance loss by going with Seagate's own
Hawk 4XL or Quantum's Viking drive. Or, if one is seeking the
ultimate in performance, the Cheetah 4LP offers substantial
improvements in performance for about $50 more. The Barracuda,
however, remains the high-performance choice if the Cheetah's
noise and/or heat prove unacceptable. The drive came with a
manual typical of the Seagate drives, a small yet thorough installation
and configuration handbook. Unlike Seagate's lower-priced Hawk,
the Barracuda 4XL is backed by a 5 year warranty, reflecting
the drive's enterprise positioning. |
|
|
|
| |
|
· Seagate Cheetah 4LP ST34501W
|
| |
|
Ziff Davis WinBench 98 - Seagate Cheetah 4LP ST34501W
|
| Business
Disk WinMark 98 |
1916 KB/sec
|
| SS/Database
|
1724 KB/sec
|
| WP |
2344 KB/sec
|
| Publishing
|
1738 KB/sec
|
| Browsers
|
2210 KB/sec
|
| Task Switching
|
2502 KB/sec
|
| |
| High-End
Disk WinMark 98 |
5354 KB/sec
|
| AVS/Express
3.1 |
3566 KB/sec
|
| Frontpage
97 |
3950 KB/sec
|
| Microstation
95 |
9450 KB/sec
|
| Photoshop
4.0 |
4356 KB/sec
|
| Premiere
4.2 |
10320 KB/sec
|
| PV-Wave
6.1 |
3958 KB/sec
|
| Visual C++
5.0 |
11300 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
Random Access |
11.8 ms |
| |
| Disk/Read
Transfer Rate |
|
| Beginning
|
14700 KB/sec
|
| End |
9840 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
CPU Utilization |
7.7%
|
| Transfer
Rate |
14654 KB/sec
|
|
| Seagate's Cheetah was the first 10,000 RPM drive to be released.
The Cheetah 4LP greatly outdistances the second fastest drive
in this roundup, Seagate's own Barracuda XL. A low random access
time plus an impressive 14.7 MB/sec sequential sector transfer
rate powered the Cheetah to the number one position. This large
increase in speed is accompanied by a relatively small increase
in price, thus making the Cheetah 4LP an easy high-end recommendation.
Two caveats: The high spindle
speed of the drive creates a very high-pitched whine above
and beyond the normal hard drive "whirr" noise. This
constant squeal can grate on the nerves of individuals sensitive
to noise. Secondly, the fast rotation of the spindle generates
a large amount of heat, making ventilation of the system very
important. In a minitower's 3.5" drive bay, the drive was
too hot to touch after being powered on for an hour. The Cheetah's
manual cautions against poor ventilation and outlines procedures
for active cooling. In most cases users will want to use a hard
drive fan to cool the drive. |
|
|
|
| |
|
· Seagate Hawk 4XL ST34555W
|
| |
|
Ziff Davis WinBench 98 - Seagate Hawk 4XL ST34555W |
| Business
Disk WinMark 98 |
1344 KB/sec
|
| SS/Database
|
1170 KB/sec
|
| WP |
1682 KB/sec
|
| Publishing
|
1248 KB/sec
|
| Browsers
|
1546 KB/sec
|
| Task Switching
|
1808 KB/sec
|
| |
| High-End
Disk WinMark 98 |
3922 KB/sec
|
| AVS/Express
3.1 |
2464 KB/sec
|
| Frontpage
97 |
3192 KB/sec
|
| Microstation
95 |
7442 KB/sec
|
| Photoshop
4.0 |
2988 KB/sec
|
| Premiere
4.2 |
7288 KB/sec
|
| PV-Wave
6.1 |
2898 KB/sec
|
| Visual C++
5.0 |
8824 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
Random Access |
14.4 ms |
| |
| Disk/Read
Transfer Rate |
|
| Beginning
|
9710 KB/sec
|
| End |
6090 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
CPU Utilization |
5.2%
|
| Transfer
Rate |
9708 KB/sec
|
|
| The Hawk 4XL is positioned as Seagate's entry-level drive,
providing decent performance at wallet-friendly prices. The
Hawk's Disk WinBench98 scores trail the Seagate Barracuda 4XL
by a relatively small amount (by 8% in Business, only 1% in
High-End) while costing substantially less. The Hawk proved
to be a little quieter than Quantum's similarly priced and similarly
performing Viking, but is backed with a more consumer-oriented
3 year warranty rather than the Viking's 5 years. The Hawk,
unlike the Viking, came with a manual detailing installation
and configuration. Even so, the Hawk 4XL warrants a solid recommendation
for those looking for an inexpensive SCSI drive. Storage Review
uses the Hawk 4XL as the boot drive for our SCSI test bed. |
|
|
|
| |
|
· Western Digital Enterprise WDE4360-0007B2
|
| |
|
Ziff Davis WinBench 98 - Western Digital Enterprise WDE4360-0007B2
|
| Business
Disk WinMark 98 |
1328 KB/sec
|
| SS/Database
|
1136 KB/sec
|
| WP |
1646 KB/sec
|
| Publishing
|
1258 KB/sec
|
| Browsers
|
1538 KB/sec
|
| Task Switching
|
1596 KB/sec
|
| |
| High-End
Disk WinMark 98 |
3410 KB/sec
|
| AVS/Express
3.1 |
2254 KB/sec
|
| Frontpage
97 |
3052 KB/sec
|
| Microstation
95 |
7016 KB/sec
|
| Photoshop
4.0 |
2116 KB/sec
|
| Premiere
4.2 |
6696 KB/sec
|
| PV-Wave
6.1 |
2658 KB/sec
|
| Visual C++
5.0 |
7098 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
Random Access |
13.1 ms |
| |
| Disk/Read
Transfer Rate |
|
| Beginning
|
6860 KB/sec
|
| End |
6016 KB/sec
|
| |
| Disk/Read
CPU Utilization |
6.1%
|
| Transfer
Rate |
7731 KB/sec
|
|
| Western Digital's Caviar series ATA drives enjoy a solid
reputation of performance and reliability. The company is not
one that first comes to mind when one thinks of SCSI drives.
Nevertheless, the company offers its "Enterprise"
series of drives. The Enterprise is a typical high-end offering,
backed by a 5 year warranty and claiming 1,000,000 MTBF hours.
Despite its rather high price, the Enterprise's performance
is unexceptional, posting average Business Winmark scores and
the lowest High-End Winmark of the roundup. Like Quantum's Viking,
the Enterprise did not come with any documentation in the box,
forcing us to go to the WD's web page to find the correct ID
and termination settings. Users will find much better performance
at the same price in Seagate's Cheetah and Barracuda, or better
performance at a much lower price with Quantum's Viking and
Seagate's Hawk. |
|
|
|
|
* Note: All reported test results are
the average of five trials.
|