---
description: The NVIDIA RTX A6000 is impressive with 10,752 CUDA processing cores, 84 next-gen RT cores, 48GB of GDDR6 RAM, & supports PCI Express 4.0 x16
title: NVIDIA RTX A6000 Review
image: https://www.storagereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/nvidia-a6000.jpg
---
[![Storage Review]()](https://storagereview.com/)
---
[Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/@storagereview) [X (Twitter)](https://twitter.twitter.com/storagereview) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/storagereview/) [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/storagereview-com) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/storagereview?sub_confirmation=1) [Email](mailto:info@storagereview.com) [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/1y6VnznABhHeOSMOmbDTz0) [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/StorageReview/) [Discord](https://discord.gg/TwMHb4azdC) [RSS Feed](https://www.storagereview.com/rss.xml) [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@storagereview)
[Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/@storagereview) [X (Twitter)](https://twitter.com/storagereview) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/storagereview/) [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/storagereview-com) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/storagereview?sub_confirmation=1) [Email](mailto:info@storagereview.com) [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/1y6VnznABhHeOSMOmbDTz0) [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/StorageReview/) [Discord](https://discord.gg/TwMHb4azdC) [RSS Feed](https://www.storagereview.com/rss.xml) [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@storagereview)
[![StorageReview.com]()](https://www.storagereview.com)
≡ Menu
- [Home](https://www.storagereview.com/)
- [Storage Reviews](https://www.storagereview.com/review)
- [End User Reviews](https://www.storagereview.com/consumer)
- [Enterprise Reviews](https://www.storagereview.com/enterprise)
- [Ubiquiti Reviews](https://www.storagereview.com/best/ubiquiti-reviews)
- [SR Merch](https://store.storagereview.com)
- [Leaderboards](https://www.storagereview.com/best)
- [Best Storage Arrays](https://www.storagereview.com/best/storage-arrays)
- [Best Enterprise SSDs](https://www.storagereview.com/best/enterprise-ssds)
- [Best Servers](https://www.storagereview.com/best/servers)
- [Best Enterprise GPUs](https://www.storagereview.com/best/enterprise-gpus)
- [Best Desktops for Local AI](https://www.storagereview.com/best/desktops-local-ai)
- [Best Laptops for Local AI](https://www.storagereview.com/best/laptops-local-ai)
- [Best Local LLM Tools](https://www.storagereview.com/best/local-llm-tools)
- [Agentic AI Hardware](https://www.storagereview.com/best/agentic-ai-hardware)
- [Best SSDs & Hard Drives](https://www.storagereview.com/best_drives)
- [Best Portable SSDs](https://www.storagereview.com/best/portable-ssds)
- [Best Business Laptops](https://www.storagereview.com/best/business-laptops)
- [Best Mobile Workstations](https://www.storagereview.com/best/mobile-workstations)
- [Best Desktop Workstations](https://www.storagereview.com/best/desktop-workstations)
- [Best Mini PCs](https://www.storagereview.com/best/mini-pcs)
- [Best Laptop Battery Life](https://www.storagereview.com/best/laptop-battery-life)
- [Storage Reference Guide](https://www.storagereview.com/storage-reference-guide)
- [About SR](https://www.storagereview.com/about-storagereview)
- [StorageReview.com Sweepstakes Rules and Regulations](https://www.storagereview.com/storagereview-com-sweepstakes-rules-and-regulations)
Search
[Home](https://www.storagereview.com/) » [Review](https://www.storagereview.com/review) » NVIDIA RTX A6000 Review
# NVIDIA RTX A6000 Review
by Lyle Smith on June 2, 2021
[Client Accessories](https://www.storagereview.com/consumer/client-accessories) ◇ [End User](https://www.storagereview.com/consumer)
The NVIDIA RTX A6000 is the company’s newest release that leverages second-generation RTX architecture. Coupling 10,752 CUDA processing cores with its 84 next-generation RT cores, the new GPU offers top-class performance in both real-time ray-tracing and professional final frame ray-tracing output. Though NVIDIA considers the RTX A6000 as a successor to the RTX 6000, it is essentially a direct replacement of the [RTX 8000](https://www.storagereview.com/review/lenovo-thinkstation-p920-tower-workstation-review-quadro-rtx-8000).
The RTX 8000 is roughly 3 years old as of this review, so it’s certainly nice to finally see a replacement to NVIDIA’s former best-of-class workstation GPU. The company recently stopped using the Quadro name to identify their professional solutions; however, the RTX A6000 still features all the same professional features, hardware and software certifications, certified drivers as the Quadro line.
## NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs. RTX 6000 vs. RTX 8000
The RTX A6000 is a huge upgrade no matter which last-gen card you compare it to, offering a more realistic output of moving objects and support for hardware-accelerated motion blur (the latter which is used to improve the final image’s overall realism when rendering moving objects). It also features accelerated AI denoising, which means higher quality output using fewer rendering passes and thus faster render times. Moreover, the A6000 is NVIDIA’s first professional graphics card that supports the PCIe Gen4 standard.
The new NVIDIA card doubles the memory size of the RTX 6000 to 48GB of GDDR6 (the same as the RTX 8000), allowing it to work with larger 3D datasets. This also means creative professionals can render large 3D scenes without having to reduce scene complexity. For professionals that have larger budgets and workloads that require more than 48GB of memory, two A6000 cards can be connected via the NVIDIA NVLink for 96GB of combined GPU memory.
![Nvidia RTX A6000 fan closeup]()
Perhaps the most significant upgrade with the RTX A6000 is [NVIDIA Ampere](https://www.storagereview.com/news/nvidia-announces-new-reference-design-platform), a new architecture that uses Samsung’s 8nm NVIDIA custom process featuring 28 billion transistors. As you will see in the performance charts below, this new architecture will blow the RTX 6000 out of the water in most of our tests.
Other Ampere highlights include:
- an improved streaming multiprocessor
- second-generation Ray Tracing cores, which improve ray tracing hardware acceleration
- third-generation Tensor Cores, which improve AI inference performance and DLSS resulting in better performance at higher resolutions
The Ampere architecture also increases CUDA cores by up to double the single-precision floating-point compared to last-gen models. This means noticeable performance improvements in areas such as 3D model development and compute like desktop simulation for computer-aided engineering.
## NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs. RTX 3090
Yes, the RTX A6000 is a direct replacement of the RTX 8000 and technically the successor to the RTX 6000, but it is actually more in line with the RTX 3090 in many ways, as far as specifications and potential performance output go. Both cards leverage the new Ampere (8nm) architecture and feature a similar CUDA and RT core count.
Any difference in performance between the two cards is likely due to the RTX 3090’s improved driver optimization and newer RAM (3090’s GDDR6X vs the A6000’s GDDR6). Nonetheless, the RTX A6000 is a massive release by NVIDIA and will outperform pretty much anything else available on the market in certain areas, so deciding on which card is best for you really comes down to your specific use case as our review benchmarks will show.
![Nvidia RTX A6000 front]()
## **NVIDIA RTX A6000 Specifications**
| GPU | RTX A6000 |
| --- | --- |
| Architecture | Ampere |
| Foundry | Samsung |
| Process Size | 8nm |
| Transistors | 28.3 billion |
| Die Size | 628.4 mm2 |
| CUDA Parallel Processing Cores | 10,752 |
| NVIDIA Tensor Cores | 336 |
| NVIDIA RT Cores | 84 |
| GPU Memory | 48 GB GDDR6 with ECC |
| Memory Interface | 384-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s |
| Max Power Consumption | 300W |
| Graphics Bus | PCI Express 4.0 x16 |
| Display Connectors | DP 1.4 (4) |
| Form Factor | 4.4” H x 10.5” L Dual Slot |
| Product Weight | 1.179 kg |
| Thermal Solution | Active |
| vGPU Software Support | NVIDIA GRID, NVIDIA Quadro Virtual Data Center Workstation, NVIDIA Virtual Compute Server |
| vGPU Profiles Supported | 1 GB, 2 GB, 3 GB, 4 GB, 6 GB, 8 GB, 12 GB, 16 GB, 24 GB, 48 GB |
| NVIDIA® 3D Vision® and 3D Vision Pro | Support via 3 pin mini DIN |
| Frame lock | Compatible (with Quadro Sync II) |
| NVLink | 2-way low profile (2-slot and 3-slot bridges) Connect 2x RTX A6000 |
| NVLink Interconnect | 112.5 GB/s (bidirectional) |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin CPU |
| NVENC \| NVDEC | 1x \| 2x (+AV1 decode) |
## **Performance**
To gauge its performance, we put the RTX A6000 through a series of resource-intensive tests and compared it to the RTX 8000 and the RTX 3090 FE. We installed the RTX A6000 in both the [HP ZCentral 4R](https://www.storagereview.com/review/hp-zcentral-4r-workstation-review) and the [P620 workstations](https://www.storagereview.com/review/lenovo-thinkstation-p620-review), which the RTX 8000 also used in some of our benchmarks:
HP ZCentral 4R:
- Intel Xeon 2295 (3.0 GHz base frequency, up to 4.6 GHz with Intel vPro Technology)
- 64GB of DDR4-2933 ECC SDRAM
- 1TB M.2 SSD
Lenovo ThinkStation P620:
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX Processor (2.70 GHz, up to 4.20 GHz Max Boost, 64 Cores, 128 Threads, 32 MB Cache)
- 64GB of DDR4 RAM
- 1TB PM981 SSD
We installed the RTX 8000 and RTX 3090 in a custom consumer-build for our Blender and LuxMark tests:
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- 4x8GB (32GB) G.Skill TridentZ Neo 3600MHz CL16
- [2TB Samsung 970 Pro](https://www.storagereview.com/review/samsung-ssd-970-pro-review)
- ASRock X570 Taichi (BIOS v4.00, PCIe Gen4)
**SPECviewperf 2020**
First up is the SPECviewperf 2020 benchmark, the worldwide standard for measuring graphics performance of professional applications running under the OpenGL and Direct X application programming interfaces. The viewsets (or benchmarks) represent graphics content and behavior from actual applications, without having to install the applications themselves. These viewsets include 3D Max, CATIA, Creo, Energy, Maya, Medical, Siemens NX, and Solidworks.
**Note**: we used a 4K resolution (3800 x 2120) for this test and both were installed in the HP ZCentral 4R.
| Viewsets | **NVIDIA RTX A6000
** Lenovo ThinkStation P620 | **NVIDIA RTX A6000**
HP ZCentral 4R | NVIDIA RTX 8000
Lenovo ThinkStation P620 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3dsmax-07 | **131.96** | **127.89** | 110.01 |
| Catia-06 | **90.99** | **75.32** | 69.37 |
| Creo-03 | **125.88** | **99.54** | 108.11 |
| Energy-03 | **42.22** | **38.83** | 27.11 |
| Maya-06 | **314.82** | **273.01** | 238.84 |
| Medical-03 | **34.87** | **30.58** | 27.67 |
| Snx-04 | **450.72** | **422.01** | 375.83 |
| Sw-05 | **161.4** | **152.19** | 136.5 |
For this benchmark, the RTX A6000 showed a dramatic improvement over the last-gen model inside both workstations, especially in the Siemens NX category. As we stated earlier, the Ampere architecture is a huge leap forward in performance, so this was certainly expected and you will see this performance trend continue in the rest of our benchmarks.
Next, we ran SPECworkstation3, a test that specializes in benchmarks designed for testing all key aspects of workstation performance; it uses over 30 workloads to test CPU, graphics, I/O, and memory bandwidth. The workloads fall into broader categories such as Media and Entertainment, Financial Services, Product Development, Energy, Life Sciences, and General Operations. We are going to list the broad-category results for each, as opposed to the individual workloads. The results are an average of all the individual workloads in each category.
**SPECworkstation3**
| Category | **NVIDIA RTX A6000
** Lenovo ThinkStation P620 | **NVIDIA RTX A6000
** HP ZCentral 4R | NVIDIA RTX 8000
Lenovo ThinkStation P620 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| M&E | **6.04** | **3.49** | 3.82 |
| ProdDev | **5.49** | **3.63** | 3.97 |
| LifeSci | **4.61** | **3.76** | 4.07 |
| Energy | **5.58** | **2.79** | did not complete |
| FSI | **9.49** | **3.38** | 4.08 |
| GeneralOps | **2.14** | **1.63** | 2.1 |
| GPU Compute | **7.44** | **7.22** | 5.88 |
Overall, we saw another significant leap in performance with most of the categories when installed inside the P620, sometimes more than doubling the result over the RTX 8000. When populated inside the HP ZCentral workstation, it showed lower numbers with the exception of the GPU Compute.
**Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri)**
Next up is the Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri) benchmark. Esri is a supplier of Geographic Information System (GIS) software while their Performance Team designed their PerfTool add-in scripts to automatically launch the ArcGIS Pro.
This application uses a “ZoomToBookmarks” function to browse various predefined bookmarks and create a log file with all the key data points required to predict the user experience. The script automatically loops the bookmarks three times to account for caching (memory and disk cache). In other words, this benchmark simulates heavy graphical use that one might see through Esri’s ArcGIS Pro software.
The tests consist of three main datasets. Two are 3-D city views of Philadelphia, PA, and Montreal, QC. These city views contain textured 3-D multipatch buildings draped on a terrain model and draped aerial images. The third dataset is a 2-D map view of the Portland, OR region. This data contains detailed information for roads, land use parcels, parks and schools, rivers, lakes, and hill shaded terrain.
First up is Montreal. Here, the RTX A6000 hit an average FPS of 614.03 and a minimum FPS of 238.18.
| **ESRI ArcGIS Pro 2.3 Montreal** | |
| --- | --- |
| | Average FPS
|
| NVIDIA RTX 8000 | 471.58 |
| **NVIDIA RTX A6000** | **614.03** |
| | Minimum FPS |
| NVIDIA RTX 8000 | 220.36 |
| **NVIDIA RTX A6000** | **238.18** |
Next up is Philly where the RTX A6000 hit an average FPS of 542.70, and a minimum FPS of 237.54.
| **ESRI ArcGIS Pro 2.3 Philly** | |
| --- | --- |
| | Average FPS
|
| NVIDIA RTX 8000 | 509.31 |
| **NVIDIA RTX A6000** | **542.70** |
| | Minimum FPS
|
| NVIDIA RTX 8000 | 271.01 |
| **NVIDIA RTX A6000** | **237.54** |
Our last model is of Portland. Here, the RTX A6000 had an average FPS of 2,756.82, and a minimum FPS of 906.17.
| **ESRI ArcGIS Pro 2.3 Portland** | |
| --- | --- |
| | Average FPS
|
| NVIDIA RTX 8000 | 2,270.52 |
| **NVIDIA RTX A6000** | **2,756.82** |
| | Minimum FPS
|
| NVIDIA RTX 8000 | 965.13 |
| **NVIDIA RTX A6000** | **906.17** |
**Blender**
Next up is the ubiquitous Blender, an open-source 3D modeling application. This benchmark was run using the Blender Benchmark utility. NVIDIA OptiX was the chosen render method, as opposed to CUDA, as the A6000 and its comparables can utilize RTX. In this benchmark measured in seconds, lower is better.
The A6000 showed huge gains in all categories (except Koro) over the RTX 8000 in both the HP and Lenovo workstation. Though it trailed the RTX 3090 in all categories, the RTX A6000 gave the gaming-behemoth GPU a run for its money.
![NVIDIA RTX A6000 Blender results]()
**LuxMark**
LuxMark is an OpenCL cross-platform benchmarking tool from those who maintain the open-source 3D rending engine, LuxRender. This tool looks at GPU performance in the areas of 3D modeling, lighting, and video work. For this review, we used the newest version, v4alpha0. In LuxMark, higher is better when it comes to the score.
In the food rendering category, the RTX A6000 scored 8,088 when inside the Lenovo P620, which more than doubled that of the RTX 8000 (which posted 3,337) and slightly trailed the RTX 3090 (which posted 8,929). In the Hallbench rendering category, the new NVIDIA card again more than double the last-gen card with 20,983 (vs. 9,794), while trailing the RTX 3090’s 23,555. Inside an HP ZCentral 4R, the RTX A6000 posted a score of 7,123 and 20,246 for the food and Hallbench categories, respectively.
![NVIDIA RTX A6000 LuxMark results]()
**OctaneBench**
Lastly, we look at OctaneBench. This is a benchmarking utility for OctaneRender and another 3D renderer with RTX support (similar to V-Ray).
| **RTX A6000 Total Score: 664.40** | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Lenovo ThinkStation P620** | | | | | |
| Scene | Kernel | Ms/s | Ratio | Weight | Score |
| Interior | info channels | 386.4874 | 7.502 | 10 | 18.75424 |
| Interior | direct lighting | 120.6423 | 6.778 | 40 | 67.77658 |
| Interior | path tracing | 60.07888 | 7.035 | 50 | 87.93748 |
| Idea | info channels | 403.6568 | 4.694 | 10 | 11.73557 |
| Idea | direct lighting | 112.0406 | 5.323 | 40 | 53.22593 |
| Idea | path tracing | 101.651 | 5.245 | 50 | 65.56436 |
| ATV | info channels | 369.6832 | 11.777 | 10 | 29.44275 |
| ATV | direct lighting | 114.5929 | 7.534 | 40 | 75.34053 |
| ATV | path tracing | 97.79354 | 7.569 | 50 | 94.61449 |
| Box | info channels | 423.7369 | 6.445 | 10 | 16.11167 |
| Box | direct lighting | 93.5092 | 6.756 | 40 | 67.56445 |
| Box | path tracing | 82.13356 | 6.107 | 50 | 76.33231 |
| **RTX A6000 Total Score: Total score: 651.2823** | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **HP ZCentral 4R** | | | | | |
| Scene | Kernel | Ms/s | Ratio | Weight | Score |
| Interior | info channels | 381.9805 | 7.414 | 10 | 18.53555 |
| Interior | direct lighting | 119.4807 | 6.712 | 40 | 67.12399 |
| Interior | path tracing | 58.97741 | 6.906 | 50 | 86.32525 |
| Idea | info channels | 393.9745 | 4.582 | 10 | 11.45408 |
| Idea | direct lighting | 109.6025 | 5.207 | 40 | 52.06769 |
| Idea | path tracing | 99.80163 | 5.15 | 50 | 64.37154 |
| ATV | info channels | 363.1271 | 11.568 | 10 | 28.92061 |
| ATV | direct lighting | 112.0573 | 7.367 | 40 | 73.67342 |
| ATV | path tracing | 95.76828 | 7.412 | 50 | 92.65507 |
| Box | info channels | 414.6209 | 6.306 | 10 | 15.76505 |
| Box | direct lighting | 91.09318 | 6.582 | 40 | 65.81877 |
| Box | path tracing | 80.23866 | 5.966 | 50 | 74.57125 |
Here, we see an overall score of 664.40 and 651.28 when used inside the HP and Lenovo workstations, respectively, which was very similar to the RTX 3090 (which had an overall score of 671.02). In addition, this more than doubled the score of the RTX 8000 (which had an overall score of 315.02).
## **Conclusion**
The RTX A6000 is an impressive release by NVIDIA, to say the least. This new professional graphics card features 10,752 CUDA processing cores, 84 next-generation RT cores, 48GB of GDDR6 RAM, and supports the PCI Express 4.0 x16 interface. The new NVIDIA card doubles the GPU memory size of the RTX 6000 to 48GB GDDR6, allowing it to work with larger and more complex 3D datasets. Professionals who have bigger pockets and need more than 48GB of memory can install two A6000 cards via the NVIDIA NVLink for a combined 96GB of DDR6 RAM.
While the RTX A6000 is technically the successor to the RTX 6000, it’s more of a direct replacement of the RTX 8000–NVIDIA’s former top workstation GPU. And even then, it’s exponentially more than just an iterative upgrade vs this last-gen model: it’s a monumental leap in performance.![rtx A6000 closeup]()
So how is the possible? The most important factor is NVIDIA Ampere. This architecture uses Samsung’s 8nm NVIDIA custom process (featuring 28 billion transistors), an improved streaming multiprocessor, second-generation Ray Tracing cores, and greatly improved ray tracing hardware acceleration. It also uses third-generation Tensor Cores, which helps to improve AI inference performance and DLSS resulting in better performance at higher resolutions. These are just a few of the highlights Ampere brings to the table and thus allows the RTX A8000 to offer a *huge* leap forward, which was certainly evident in our performance tests.
Another interesting feature for those who have the means to do it (and necessity) is the RTX A6000’s support for the Quadro Sync II add-in card. This allows the GPU to synchronize both the display and image output from various compatible GPUs within a single system (or a cluster of systems), as each Quadro Sync II card can synchronize the output of up to four RTX A6000 cards. That is, users can install up to two Quadro Sync II cards on a single system, which means a workstation with eight GPUs (each with four active independent display outputs) has the ability to support up to 32 synchronized video displays.
Even though the RTX A6000 is a replacement to the RTX 8000, it is actually more comparable to the RTX 3090, where it trailed ever so slightly in our benchmark tests. As we mentioned earlier, this minor performance difference is likely because of Quadro driver optimizations and newer RAM.
![rtx a6000 ports]()
So, who is the RTX A6000 meant for and should I buy an RTX 3090 instead? Well, it depends. Deciding which GPU to get should be based on whatever your workflow is or what it might be in the short-term future. It’s incredibly hard to get a hold of any RTX card these days, but if you are in a position to do so, the RTX A6000 best suits those who work primarily in CAD (more specifically, in scientific fields with applications like Creo and CATIA), as the RTX 3090 doesn’t provide the necessary driver optimizations that come with the Quadro line of cards. Though we did not test the RTX A6000 in any game experience benchmarks, the RTX 3090 is certainly the best gaming GPU money can buy, especially with games that leverage ray-tracing and DLSS 2.0.
With all this said, the Ampere-based RTX A6000 will greatly outperform pretty much anything else available on the market in certain areas, so if you’re a professional that needs a powerful visual-computing GPU for your desktop workstation, the RTX A6000 is the best card available right now.
[NVIDIA GPUs](https://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/graphics-cards/)
**Engage with StorageReview**
[Newsletter](https://www.storagereview.com/storage_newsletter) | [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/StorageReview "Opens in a new window") | Podcast [iTunes](https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/storagereview-com-storage-reviews/id1060681115 "Opens in a new window")/ [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/1y6VnznABhHeOSMOmbDTz0 "Opens in a new window") | [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/storagereview/ "Opens in a new window") | [Twitter](https://twitter.com/storagereview "Opens in a new window") | [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@storagereview? "Opens in a new window") | [RSS Feed](https://www.storagereview.com/rss.xml)
![]()
### Lyle Smith
Lyle is a writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics.
Previous post: [Dell OptiPlex 7090 Ultra Review](https://www.storagereview.com/review/dell-optiplex-7090-ultra-review)
Next post: [Simply NUC Ruby R8 (CBM1r8RB) AMD NUC Review](https://www.storagereview.com/review/simply-nuc-ruby-r8-cbm1r8rb-amd-nuc-review)
Trusted Vendors
Products and solutions from our affiliate partners:
- [
![Ubiquiti Logo]()
Ubiquiti
](https://store.ui.com/us/en?a_aid=StorageReview "Opens in a new window")
- [
![Newegg Logo]()
Newegg
](https://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=g5terNMDhz0&offerid=1207190.18&subid=0&type=4 "Opens in a new window")
- [
![Amazon Logo]() Amazon
](https://amzn.to/4fLJUEW "Opens in a new window")
Newsletter
Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. We promise no spam!
1
Leave this field empty if you’re human:
## Advertisement
Content Categories
[Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/@storagereview) [X](https://twitter.com/storagereview) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/storagereview/) [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/storagereview-com) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/storagereview?sub_confirmation=1) [Email](mailto:info@storagereview.com) [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/1y6VnznABhHeOSMOmbDTz0) [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/StorageReview/) [Discord](https://discord.gg/TwMHb4azdC) [RSS](https://www.storagereview.com/rss.xml) [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@storagereview)
Copyright © 1998-2025 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. All rights reserved.
Manage your privacy
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
Functional Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Statistics
Marketing
Features
Always active
Special features
Special purposes
Always active
- Manage options
- Manage services
- Manage {vendor\_count} vendors
- [Read more about these purposes](https://cookiedatabase.org/tcf/purposes/)
Accept Deny Manage options Save preferences Manage options
- {title}
- {title}
- {title}
Manage your privacy
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Statistics
Marketing
Features
Always active
Special features
Special purposes
Always active
- Manage options
- Manage services
- Manage {vendor\_count} vendors
- [Read more about these purposes](https://cookiedatabase.org/tcf/purposes/)
Accept Deny Manage options Save preferences Manage options
- {title}
- {title}
- {title}
Manage consent Manage consent
```json
{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/nvidia-rtx-a6000-review","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/nvidia-rtx-a6000-review","name":"NVIDIA RTX A6000 Review - StorageReview.com","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/nvidia-rtx-a6000-review#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/nvidia-rtx-a6000-review#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/nvidia-a6000.jpg","datePublished":"2021-06-02T18:56:09+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-02T19:43:36+00:00","description":"The NVIDIA RTX A6000 is impressive with 10,752 CUDA processing cores, 84 next-gen RT cores, 48GB of GDDR6 RAM, & supports PCI Express 4.0 x16","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/nvidia-rtx-a6000-review#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/nvidia-rtx-a6000-review"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/nvidia-rtx-a6000-review#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/nvidia-a6000.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/nvidia-a6000.jpg","width":1000,"height":649,"caption":"Nvidia RTX A6000"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/nvidia-rtx-a6000-review#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Review","item":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"NVIDIA RTX A6000 Review"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/","name":"StorageReview.com","description":"StorageReview.com is a leading provider of news and reviews throughout the entire IT stack - from the datacenter to the edge, and all points in between.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#organization","name":"StorageReview.com","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Storage-Reviews-2-2.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Storage-Reviews-2-2.png","width":344,"height":61,"caption":"StorageReview.com"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/storagereview","http:\/\/youtube.com\/user\/storagereview"]}]}
```