Consumer

Crucial m4 SSD 64GB/128GB Review (Firmware 0009)

We’ve looked at the Crucial m4 SSD in the past – once with the original firmware and then again with the updated firmware 0009. In this review we add in the data sets for the 64GB and 128GB versions with the old and new firmware. The goal: find out if they improve the same as the 256GB version we’ve already seen.


We’ve looked at the Crucial m4 SSD in the past – once with the original firmware and then again with the updated firmware 0009. In this review we add in the data sets for the 64GB and 128GB versions with the old and new firmware. The goal: find out if they improve the same as the 256GB version we’ve already seen.
To avoid repetition, take a look at our original review of the Crucial m4 for background information including specs and aesthetics. And here’s where you can find the updated review that focuses on the differences between the original firmware and the new 0009 firmware. In short, Crucial fixed bugs, improved sequential read speeds by 20% and improved overall system compatibility.
Hardware Differences
From the outside it might be obvious that each different capacity m4 SSD has varying NAND amounts; but what some users might not be immediately aware of is this can play into the performance of the drive itself. We took a peek inside the 64GB, 128GB, and 256GB Crucial m4’s and looked at how each was setup internally. The 128GB and 256GB models share the same sixteen-piece 25nm IMFT NAND configuration, which to the shopper means full bandwidth and optimum transfer speeds to the SSD. The 64GB model though uses an eight-piece setup, which nearly halves the write speeds compared to the larger models. As you can see below, choosing the capacity of the drive will play a role in the performance.

Synthetic Benchmarks

 

Our synthetic benchmark tests will show the best possible performance these drives can achieve in real life. Carefully note the differences between the original firmware 0001/0002 drives and the latest firmware 0009-equipped drives.
Both the 64GB and 128GB drives show an 18-19% improvement in sequential read speeds exactly as Crucial promised. Note how the write performance improves significantly as the drive capacity increases.
This random transfer benchmark produces similar numbers; we’re seeing read performance improvements in the area of 13-17% across all drives, including the 256GB models. Write performance stays the same.
The 4k random transfer benchmarks use a smaller file size. We’re seeing performance improvements in the area of 3-4.5% in write speeds, which is not something we’d noticed in earlier benchmarks. This might be due to the fact this firmware also improves the latency; the more files that are accessed (as with a smaller file size), the more this comes into play. In addition, we also saw read speeds increase from 0.5-5%.
Here we can see the average latency improve a small but noticeable amount, especially in the maximum measurement; firmware 0009 produces numbers up to 40% lower than before.
The sequential read numbers at the top of the charts highlights the sequential read improvements with the new firmware we saw earlier in the IOMeter 2MB sequential transfer test. Additionally, we can see improvements in the random 512k read in the area of 13-17%. The write numbers don’t noticeably change – Crucial didn’t claim they would.
The next series of IOMeter benchmarks subjects the drive to a server-style workload; we expect to see a performance gain from left to right as the queue depth increases.
The old and new firmware-equipped drives trade places with one another throughout these benchmarks. They aren’t necessarily relevant for general consumers as this benchmark set is aimed at enterprise/server users.


Real-World Benchmarks

 

This benchmark shows very little performance gain mainly due to the fact that this is a write-focused benchmark and the write speeds weren’t largely impacted by the firmware revision.
Again we’re seeing mostly small gains, around 2% overall. The latency drops as promised, though.
The read-focused gaming benchmark shows significant gains in the area of 5% and 9% for the 64GB and 128GB drives, respectively; the 256GB drive shows up to a 25% gain, likely due to its much better write performance. In addition the average latency fell across the board for drives with the new firmware.

Conclusion

 

Crucial has a real winner on its hands with the m4; this latest firmware 0009 bumps the performance up a notch and, combined with the company’s aggressive pricing, makes it one of the better choices for a modern SATA III SSD. We observed read performance increases in the area of 13-18% with the new firmware on the 64GB and 128GB drives (the 256GB drive showed higher gains). Additionally the average latency dropped consistently in all our benchmarks. Write performance did not improve though was already respectable; it certainly didn’t decrease. We noticed a small performance drop for server-style applications, but this isn’t entirely relevant for non-enterprise customers.
With increased system compatibility, tier-1 Micron NAND and great pricing we can safely give the Crucial m4 family our full recommendation.

storagereview

Recent Posts

Graid SupremeRAID SR-1001 Review

The Graid SupremeRAID SR-1001 is an excellent choice for those seeking to balance cost with performance in small NVMe RAID…

1 day ago

Object First Ootbi: Simple Ransomware-Proof Backups For Veeam

With ransomware attacks on the rise, there's no easier-to-use solution for Veeam to protect your data than Ootbi by Object…

3 days ago

Dell Precision 5690 Review

The Dell Precision 5690 laptop is surprisingly lightweight but packs a powerful punch, our review unit includes a NVIDIA RTX…

5 days ago

UGREEN DXP480T Plus SSD NAS Review

The UGREEN DXP480T Plus offers an alluring blend of portability and performance in a tiny body with 4 M.2 NVMe…

1 week ago

How to Get Started with TrueNAS Scale

TrueNAS has gained traction in the self-host and homelab communities for several reasons. One primary reason is that it's free…

1 week ago

VDI Acceleration For All? Intel Data Center GPU Flex Series 170 Review

The Intel Data Center GPU Flex Series 170 ia tantalizing for organizations that want to provide their VDI users with…

2 weeks ago