--- description: The Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD is the latest high-performance SSD from Seagate. The 530 leverages PCIe Gen4 and comes in capacities up to 4TB. title: Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD Review image: https://www.storagereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/storagereview-seatgate-firecuda-530-front.jpg --- [![Storage Review]()](https://storagereview.com/) --- [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/@storagereview) [X (Twitter)](https://twitter.twitter.com/storagereview) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/storagereview/) [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/storagereview-com) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/storagereview?sub_confirmation=1) [Email](mailto:info@storagereview.com) [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/1y6VnznABhHeOSMOmbDTz0) [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/StorageReview/) [Discord](https://discord.gg/TwMHb4azdC) [RSS Feed](https://www.storagereview.com/rss.xml) [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@storagereview) [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/@storagereview) [X (Twitter)](https://twitter.com/storagereview) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/storagereview/) [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/storagereview-com) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/storagereview?sub_confirmation=1) [Email](mailto:info@storagereview.com) [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/1y6VnznABhHeOSMOmbDTz0) [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/StorageReview/) [Discord](https://discord.gg/TwMHb4azdC) [RSS Feed](https://www.storagereview.com/rss.xml) [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@storagereview) [![StorageReview.com](https://www.storagereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Storage-Review-2x.png)](https://www.storagereview.com) ≡ Menu - [Home](https://www.storagereview.com/) - [Storage Reviews](https://www.storagereview.com/review) - [End User Reviews](https://www.storagereview.com/consumer) - [Enterprise Reviews](https://www.storagereview.com/enterprise) - [Ubiquiti Reviews](https://www.storagereview.com/best/ubiquiti-reviews) - [SR Merch](https://store.storagereview.com) - [Leaderboards](https://www.storagereview.com/best) - [Best Storage Arrays](https://www.storagereview.com/best/storage-arrays) - [Best Enterprise SSDs](https://www.storagereview.com/best/enterprise-ssds) - [Best Servers](https://www.storagereview.com/best/servers) - [Best Desktops for Local AI](https://www.storagereview.com/best/desktops-local-ai) - [Best Laptops for Local AI](https://www.storagereview.com/best/laptops-local-ai) - [Best Local LLM Tools](https://www.storagereview.com/best/local-llm-tools) - [Agentic AI Hardware](https://www.storagereview.com/best/agentic-ai-hardware) - [Best SSDs & Hard Drives](https://www.storagereview.com/best_drives) - [Best Portable SSDs](https://www.storagereview.com/best/portable-ssds) - [Best Business Laptops](https://www.storagereview.com/best/business-laptops) - [Best Mobile Workstations](https://www.storagereview.com/best/mobile-workstations) - [Best Desktop Workstations](https://www.storagereview.com/best/desktop-workstations) - [Best Mini PCs](https://www.storagereview.com/best/mini-pcs) - [Best Laptop Battery Life](https://www.storagereview.com/best/laptop-battery-life) - [Storage Reference Guide](https://www.storagereview.com/storage-reference-guide) - [About SR](https://www.storagereview.com/about-storagereview) - [StorageReview.com Sweepstakes Rules and Regulations](https://www.storagereview.com/storagereview-com-sweepstakes-rules-and-regulations) Search [Home](https://www.storagereview.com/) » [Review](https://www.storagereview.com/review) » Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD Review # Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD Review by Ethan Carter Edwards on August 30, 2021 [Client SSD](https://www.storagereview.com/consumer/client-ssd)  ◇  [End User](https://www.storagereview.com/consumer) The Seagate FireCuda 530 PCIe Gen4 M.2 SSD is the latest in Seagate’s FireCuda lineup specifically designed for PC Gaming.  Unlike previous drives, the FireCuda 530 uses PCIe Gen4 and 3D TLC NAND, it also comes in capacities ranging from 500GB to 4TB. Although it is more expensive than most consumer drives, its performance may justify the price for some serious gamers. ![Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD](https://www.storagereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/storagereview-seatgate-firecuda-530-front.jpg) Performance-wise, Seagate quotes the FireCuda 530 with sequential read speeds of up to 7300 MB/s. The longevity and reliability of this drive are also an impressive aspect, advertised to have a 1.8 Million MTBF (mean time between failures) and up to 5100 TBW. A huge improvement to previous generation [FireCuda](https://www.storagereview.com/review/seagate-firecuda-510-ssd-review). ![]() Seagate uses the [Phison E18 controller](https://www.storagereview.com/review/phison-ps5018-e18-controller-hands-on), which they state is a “Seagate-validated” part. With the E18 being one of the better consumer Gen4 controllers we’ve seen recently, its no question why they went with this model. ![Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD back]() The Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD comes with a 5-year warranty and the smallest capacity can be [purchased for around $160](https://amzn.to/3kAlGSO). In this review, we will be taking a look at the 2TB, $540, version. ## Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD Specifications | Model | ZP2000GM30013 | | --- | --- | | Interface | PCIe 4.0 NVMe x4 NVMe 1.4 | | Capacity | 500GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | | NAND | 3D TLC NAND | | Performance | Read/Write: up to 7,300 / 6,900 MB/s Read/Write: up to 1,000,000 IOPS 4K | | MTBF | 1,800,000 hours | | Temperatures | Operation: 0˚C \~ 70˚C Storage: -40˚C \~ 85˚C | | Weight | 6g | | Dimensions | 80.15(L) x 22.15(W) x 3.58(H) mm | | Endurance | 2,550 TB | | Warranty | 5-year limited warranty | ## Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD Performance **Testbed** As we migrate into testing newer NVME Gen4 SSDs, it required a platform shift in our lab to support the newer interface. Lenovo has been out in the front of the pack with PCIe Gen4 support, including up to the front-mount U.2 bays, while others still only offer edge-card support. In our Gen4 reviews, we leverage the [Lenovo ThinkSystem SR635 server](https://www.storagereview.com/review/lenovo-thinksystem-sr635-review), equipped with an AMD 7742 CPU and 512GB of 3200Mhz DDR4 memory. NVMe SSDs are tested natively through an M.2 to PCIe adapter card in the edge-card slot, while U.2 drives are loaded in the front. The methodology used better reflects end-user workflow with the consistency, scalability, and flexibility testing within virtualized server offers. A large focus is put on drive latency across the entire load range of the drive, not just at the smallest QD1 (Queue-Depth 1) levels. We do this because many of the common consumer benchmarks don’t adequately capture end-user workload profiles. **SQL Server Performance** Each SQL Server VM is configured with two vDisks: 100GB volume for boot and a 500GB volume for the database and log files. From a system resource perspective, we configured each VM with 16 vCPUs, 64GB of DRAM and leveraged the LSI Logic SAS SCSI controller. While our Sysbench workloads tested previously saturated the platform in both storage I/O and capacity, the SQL test is looking for latency performance. This test uses SQL Server 2014 running on Windows Server 2012 R2 guest VMs and is stressed by Quest’s Benchmark Factory for Databases. StorageReview’s Microsoft SQL Server OLTP testing protocol employs the current draft of the Transaction Processing Performance Council’s Benchmark C (TPC-C), an online transaction-processing benchmark that simulates the activities found in complex application environments. The TPC-C benchmark comes closer than synthetic performance benchmarks to gauging the performance strengths and bottlenecks of storage infrastructure in database environments. Each instance of our SQL Server VM for this review uses a 333GB (1,500 scale) SQL Server database and measures the transactional performance and latency under a load of 15,000 virtual users. - SQL Server Testing Configuration (per VM) - Windows Server 2012 R2 - Storage Footprint: 600GB allocated, 500GB used - SQL Server 2014 - Database size: 1,500 scale - Virtual Client Load: 15,000 - RAM Buffer: 48GB - Test Length: 3 hours - 2.5 hours preconditioning - 30 minutes sample-period Looking at SQL Server average latency, the Seagate FireCuda 530 had an average latency of 2ms, which places it at an impressive tie for 2nd. Only beaten by the [Samsung 970 EVO Plus](https://www.storagereview.com/review/samsung-970-evo-plus-1tb-review). ![]()**VDBench Workload Analysis** When it comes to benchmarking storage devices, application testing is best, and synthetic testing comes in second place. While not a perfect representation of actual workloads, synthetic tests do help to baseline storage devices with a repeatability factor that makes it easy to do apples-to-apples comparison between competing solutions. These workloads offer a range of different testing profiles ranging from “four corners” tests, common database transfer size tests, to trace captures from different VDI environments. All of these tests leverage the common vdBench workload generator, with a scripting engine to automate and capture results over a large compute testing cluster. This allows us to repeat the same workloads across a wide range of storage devices, including flash arrays and individual storage devices. Our testing process for these benchmarks fills the entire drive surface with data, then partitions a drive section equal to 5% of the drive capacity to simulate how the drive might respond to application workloads. This is different than full entropy tests which use 100% of the drive and take them into a steady state. As a result, these figures will reflect higher-sustained write speeds. Profiles: - 4K Random Read: 100% Read, 128 threads, 0-120% iorate - 4K Random Write: 100% Write, 64 threads, 0-120% iorate - 64K Sequential Read: 100% Read, 16 threads, 0-120% iorate - 64K Sequential Write: 100% Write, 8 threads, 0-120% iorate Comparables for this review: - [Phison PS5018-E18](https://www.storagereview.com/review/phison-ps5018-e18-controller-hands-on) - [Samsung 980 Pro 1TB](https://www.storagereview.com/review/samsung-980-pro-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review) - [Samsung 980 Pro 2TB](https://www.storagereview.com/review/samsung-980-pro-ssd-review-2tb) - [XPG GAMMIX S70 SSD](https://www.storagereview.com/review/xpg-gammix-s70-ssd-review) - [Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus](https://www.storagereview.com/review/sabrent-rocket-4-plus-ssd-review) In 4K random read, the Seagate FireCuda 530 starts the testing with a high scoring IOPS of 577,825 and latency of 219.7µs. ![]() For 4K write, the Seagate FireCuda 530 continues the high scoring trend with IOPS of 550,137 and latency of 220.7µs. ![]() Now looking at the sequential workloads, we look at the 64K tests. For reads, the Seagate FireCuda 530 still scoring very high, at 90,851 IOPS or 5.67GB/s with a latency of 350.9µs. ![]() In 64K writes, the FireCuda 530 placed 2nd place again, sporting a peak score of 32,162 IOPS or 2.01GB/s at a latency of 170µs. ![]() Next, we are looking at VDI benchmarks, which are designed to push the drives even further. These tests include Boot, Initial Login, and Monday Login. Looking at the Boot test, the FireCuda 530 keeps fighting with the front-runners, with a peak of 128,481 IOPS at a latency of 266.9µs. ![]() VDI Initial Login results were different being outmatched by its competitors, with a peak of 33,852 IOPS at 882.6µs before a very sharp drop off. ![]() Last but not least, with the VDI Monday Login test, the FireCuda 530 easily takes first with IOPS of 44,059 with a latency of 255.1µs. ![]() ## Conclusion The Seagate FireCuda 530 PCIe Gen4 M.2 SSD takes advantage of PCIe Gen4 and 3D TLC NAND for a very impressive performance showcase. Although this drive is designed for consumer workloads, more specifically gaming, it can hold its own in enterprise applications when tasked with server workloads. Although we tested the 2TB version, you can expect slight performance differences with different sizes. Going up in performance with the bigger sizes, and down with the lower sizes. ![Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD in server]() When looking at the Application Workload Analysis performance, the Seagate FireCuda 530 showed the second fastest results the lab has seen yet, bested by the [Samsung 980 Pro 2TB](https://www.storagereview.com/review/samsung-980-pro-ssd-review-2tb). Some highlights include 577,835 IOPS in 4K read, 5.67GB/s in 64K read, 2.01GB/s in 64K write, and finally in VDI boot we saw 128,481 IOPS. The Seagate FireCuda 530 is a very impressive drive, no doubt about it, but for the very steep price-point of up to \*$1,000\* for the 4TB version, it is very hard to justify that capacity point, especially for gaming. When comparing it to other drives that boast similar performance, namely the [Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus](https://www.storagereview.com/review/sabrent-rocket-4-plus-ssd-review) and [Samsung 980 Pro 2TB](https://www.storagereview.com/review/samsung-980-pro-ssd-review-2tb), it makes the difference much more apparent, retailing at $200/$200 (1TB) and $396/$470 respectively, while the FireCuda 530 goes for $260 (1TB) and $540 (2TB). Overall with Seagate taking the approach of using the high-performing Phison E18 controller at the heart of the FireCuda 530, it makes it a very competitive offering, coming in near the top in our benchmarks. [FireCuda 530 at Amazon](https://amzn.to/3kAlGSO) **Engage with StorageReview** [Newsletter](https://www.storagereview.com/storage_newsletter) |  [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/StorageReview "Opens in a new window") | Podcast  [iTunes](https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/storagereview-com-storage-reviews/id1060681115 "Opens in a new window")/ [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/1y6VnznABhHeOSMOmbDTz0 "Opens in a new window") |  [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/storagereview/ "Opens in a new window") |  [Twitter](https://twitter.com/storagereview "Opens in a new window") |  [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@storagereview? "Opens in a new window") |  [RSS Feed](https://www.storagereview.com/rss.xml) ![]() ### Ethan Carter Edwards Previous post: [LG 34CN650 34″ All-in-One Thin Client Review](https://www.storagereview.com/review/lg-34cn650-34-all-in-one-thin-client-review) Next post: [Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen 2 Review](https://www.storagereview.com/review/lenovo-thinkpad-p15-gen-2-review) Trusted Vendors Products and solutions from our affiliate partners: - [ ![Ubiquiti Logo](https://www.storagereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/2-1.webp) Ubiquiti ](https://store.ui.com/us/en?a_aid=StorageReview "Opens in a new window") - [ ![Newegg Logo](https://www.storagereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/newegg.webp) Newegg ](https://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=g5terNMDhz0&offerid=1207190.18&subid=0&type=4 "Opens in a new window") - [ ![Amazon Logo](https://www.storagereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/amazon.webp) Amazon ](https://amzn.to/4fLJUEW "Opens in a new window") Newsletter Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. We promise no spam! 1 Leave this field empty if you’re human: ## Advertisement Content Categories [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/@storagereview) [X](https://twitter.com/storagereview) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/storagereview/) [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/storagereview-com) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/storagereview?sub_confirmation=1) [Email](mailto:info@storagereview.com) [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/1y6VnznABhHeOSMOmbDTz0) [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/StorageReview/) [Discord](https://discord.gg/TwMHb4azdC) [RSS](https://www.storagereview.com/rss.xml) [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@storagereview) Copyright © 1998-2025 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. All rights reserved. Manage your privacy To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions. Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen. Functional Functional Always active The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network. Preferences Preferences The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user. Statistics Statistics The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you. Marketing Marketing The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes. Statistics Marketing Features Always active Always active - Manage options - Manage services - Manage {vendor\_count} vendors - [Read more about these purposes](https://cookiedatabase.org/tcf/purposes/) Accept Deny Manage options Save preferences Manage options - {title} - {title} - {title} Manage your privacy To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions. Functional Functional Always active The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network. Preferences Preferences The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user. Statistics Statistics The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you. Marketing Marketing The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes. Statistics Marketing Features Always active Always active - Manage options - Manage services - Manage {vendor\_count} vendors - [Read more about these purposes](https://cookiedatabase.org/tcf/purposes/) Accept Deny Manage options Save preferences Manage options - {title} - {title} - {title} Manage consent Manage consent ```json {"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/seagate-firecuda-530-ssd-review","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/seagate-firecuda-530-ssd-review","name":"Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD Review - StorageReview.com","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/seagate-firecuda-530-ssd-review#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/seagate-firecuda-530-ssd-review#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/storagereview-seatgate-firecuda-530-front.jpg","datePublished":"2021-08-30T19:37:08+00:00","description":"The Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD is the latest high-performance SSD from Seagate. The 530 leverages PCIe Gen4 and comes in capacities up to 4TB.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/seagate-firecuda-530-ssd-review#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/seagate-firecuda-530-ssd-review"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/seagate-firecuda-530-ssd-review#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/storagereview-seatgate-firecuda-530-front.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/storagereview-seatgate-firecuda-530-front.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review\/seagate-firecuda-530-ssd-review#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Review","item":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/review"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Seagate FireCuda 530 SSD Review"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/","name":"StorageReview.com","description":"StorageReview.com is a leading provider of news and reviews throughout the entire IT stack - from the datacenter to the edge, and all points in between.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#organization","name":"StorageReview.com","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Storage-Reviews-2-2.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Storage-Reviews-2-2.png","width":344,"height":61,"caption":"StorageReview.com"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.storagereview.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/storagereview","http:\/\/youtube.com\/user\/storagereview"]}]} ```