…NoSQL database benchmark, the Fusion–io ioDrive2 MLC lagged slightly behind the Intel SSD 910 with a response time of 4.685ms compared to 4.286ms. The Fusion–io ioDrive2 MLC offered similar latency…

The Fusion–io ioDrive2 Duo MLC is a full-height half-length (FHHL) application accelerator that provides up to 2.4TB of capacity via x8 PCI Express slot. Fusion–io cards are notorious for their throughput performance as…

…market support much higher power demands, so Fusion–io included the ability to enable higher power modes through the slot itself. Testing Background and Comparables The Fusion–io ioMemory SX300 a single…

…GUI interface, support for most mainstream server brands and interface cards, and HA configuration options, while still driving tremendous scalable IO out of a single box. Fusion–io ION Product Page…

…Fusion–io ioDrive Duos on the Hyperion Data Intensive Testbed. This separate node setup achieved an even higher TEPS rate than the single node setup. Fusion–io memory is used in several…

…HP data, while all application benchmarks are gathered with the drive over-provisioned. Comparables for this review: Fusion–io ioDrive2 Duo (1.2TB, 2 x Xilinx Virtex-6 FPGA controllers, SLC NAND, PCIe 2.0 x4) LSI…

…most operations will never be IO bound. However, if the database is too large to fit into memory, then IO performance will dictate transactional response times and throughput. We are…

…products outperform Fusion–io whenever they have an opportunity. Memblaze provided us with evaluation units of its 2.4TB PBlaze3H MLC and 1.2TB PBlaze3L MLC to put through the paces against comparable…

…User Average Response Time (ms) Fusion ioDrive2 Duo 2.4TB eMLC PCIe 6322.78 3 Huawei ES3000 2.4TB MLC PCIe 6321.67 3 Fusion SX300 3.2TB MLC PCIe 6321.1 3 Fusion ioDrive2 Duo…